Search found 2 matches

by A-R
Sat Jul 21, 2012 2:35 pm
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Let's BAN Guns
Replies: 35
Views: 6137

Re: Let's BAN Guns

KurteL10 wrote:New here, so please forgive me if this has been addressed someplace before (I searched). I am only 22 years old, so the "assault" weapons ban was a little before my time. I know that guns purchased before the ban were legal, but were you still allowed to purchase parts for them? Was is similar to the way class 3 firearms are handled today? With all this new talk of bans, I don't want to be out of luck if something does happen. Thanks. :txflag:

FYI - since you're new here, fair warning the 3-letter acronym in your last sentence is not allowed under rules as its intended meaning includes a vulgar/profane word.

I'm no expert on the 1994 ban, but I believe it only limited the specific parts used to define the made-up term "assault weapon" - thus flash hiders, magazines holding more than 10 rounds, etc. would have been illegal except for the grandfathered pre-94 versions. Not too many other "parts" that I can think of - collapsible/folding stocks, perhaps the pistol grip itself?

Anyway, someone will be along shortly who knows/remembers more of the details.
by A-R
Sat Jul 21, 2012 8:44 am
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Let's BAN Guns
Replies: 35
Views: 6137

Re: Let's BAN Guns

fixed ex-Gov. Rendell's quote to reflect its true meaning:
“We’re terrified of the [People]. We Democrats are as bad as the Republicans. Everyone is scared of the [People],” Rendell said Friday on MSNBC. “There are some things worth losing for in politics, and to be able to prevent carnage like this is worth losing for.”


Yes, Mr. Rendell, when you fight against the will of the People, YOU WILL LOSE

but since you're an EX governor, I'm sure you already know that

:patriot:

Return to “Let's BAN Guns”