Is that allowed in the age of Obanacare-style insurance regulation?ScottDLS wrote:Competition.A-R wrote:I think most of us understand the basics of actuarial insurance.
The key is what statistics will (could) be used (abused) to charge gun owners a higher rate?
Or what could stop an insurance firm from simply charging gun owners more on a whim, to make a political point, as a social engineering endeavor, or simply because someone high up in the firm is a fervent anti-gun ideologue?
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Back Door Gun Control through Insurance Premiums”
- Thu May 29, 2014 8:20 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Back Door Gun Control through Insurance Premiums
- Replies: 16
- Views: 3897
Re: Back Door Gun Control through Insurance Premiums
- Thu May 29, 2014 7:35 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Back Door Gun Control through Insurance Premiums
- Replies: 16
- Views: 3897
Re: Back Door Gun Control through Insurance Premiums
I think most of us understand the basics of actuarial insurance.
The key is what statistics will (could) be used (abused) to charge gun owners a higher rate?
Or what could stop an insurance firm from simply charging gun owners more on a whim, to make a political point, as a social engineering endeavor, or simply because someone high up in the firm is a fervent anti-gun ideologue?
The key is what statistics will (could) be used (abused) to charge gun owners a higher rate?
Or what could stop an insurance firm from simply charging gun owners more on a whim, to make a political point, as a social engineering endeavor, or simply because someone high up in the firm is a fervent anti-gun ideologue?