TexasCHLforum.com

RHenriksen is correct. According to Lott's testimony, Carry Permit applications increased over time after an initial dip. Again, according to Lott, there was no appreciable difference in crime or firearms accidents before or after thus, no affect. Sorry I was not more clear.

Correct as to the FOR, AGAINST, or ON. In fact, when Dr. John Lott testified, he stated rather emphatically that he was not testifying FOR or AGAINST, the bill, but was testifying ON and simply presenting facts based upon his research on the states which have already enacted Permitless Carry. His facts clearly showed that in those states, neither crime nor accidents increased and after an initial dip in carry applications, they actually increased over time.

Yes, anyone may testify. You go to the capital, they have sign-in kiosks where you sign up to testify on a particular bill and then when that bill is under discussion by the committee, you are called to speak (usually) in order of sign up. However the committee members reserve the right to take some folks out of order if they have a particular witness that they want on the record. You are usually limited to a certain number of minutes (3-5) to make your point then the committee MAY ask questions which can extend your time to answer. When I did it for the House committee a few weeks ago, signed up about 0830 on Thursday morning, but due to other bills, and the number of witnesses, did not testify until approximately 0130 Friday morning---long day.

As has been stated earlier, emotional rants on either side are counter-productive. It is best to dress professionally, state your case using facts, not emotions, and not threatening the committee members.