TexasCHLforum.com

Jaguar wrote:

suthdj wrote:

Excaliber wrote:The latest edition of John Lott's "More Guns, Less Crime" should provide most of what you need. It's been peer reviewed multiple times and never invalidated.

Yes, but I need at least 5 ref. thanks for that one.

There was a website I read awhile back written by a jewish person about projection by the anti's.

http://jpfo.org/filegen-n-z/ragingagain ... efense.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Love that article.

jimlongley wrote:There are no "fors" either, and it can be shown that it doesn't work, but most of the sites that you will find that do anything more than present raw data for your interpretation, are going to be biased in their own interpretation, so tread carefully.

Also, make sure in advance, that your subject will be accepted. A whole bunch of years ago I turned in a term paper on the history of firearms. The assignment was to present a research based paper, and to show all of the research that took place as an addendum to the paper. Complete bibliography, etc. The "professor" took an entire letter grade off for "inappropriate subject matter."

Excaliber wrote:The latest edition of John Lott's "More Guns, Less Crime" should provide most of what you need. It's been peer reviewed multiple times and never invalidated.

ghostrider wrote:There isn't any 'pro'. gun control doesn't work (except for tracking/confiscation from the law abiding).

Could you be more specific about what your looking for? Data? Laws? Comparisons?