Saying that an entire department or union is anti-CHL because their spokesman says something to that effect, is like saying that All Americans Want Public Health care.... because Obama says it, and he's our spokesman to the world, right?Captain Matt wrote: I disagree. If a department or union is anti CHL then their members don't deserve our support, our help, or our respect. They want to create an us-vs-them division, then let them reap what they sow.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Police not happy about relazation of TX CHL law”
- Sun Sep 13, 2009 5:21 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Police not happy about relazation of TX CHL law
- Replies: 98
- Views: 12532
Re: Police not happy about relazation of TX CHL law
- Sun Sep 13, 2009 10:43 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Police not happy about relazation of TX CHL law
- Replies: 98
- Views: 12532
Re: Police not happy about relazation of TX CHL law
dac1842 wrote:You must be kidding me. If you observed an officer in trouble you would not stop?roberts wrote:As long as Gary Blankinship is their spokesman, I will keep on driving and mind my own business if I ever see a Houston cop in trouble. I don't want them to wet themselves if they observe my weapon. Or shoot me for trying to help.
I'm sorry, but I can't just drive by someone obviously in trouble, and need of help. Police officer or not.
A few women on the side of the road with a flat, a spare out, and obviously no experience in changing a tire? I'll stop (And yes, you can Easily tell this in about 2 seconds. If you happen to drive by it)
However, if they have a gentleman with them, I will assume that he knows how to change a tire, and will continue on, unless he is standing there scratching his head too.
An Officer on the side of the road in a door-to-door shootout with someone? No, I won't Stop, Rather, I'd aim my vehicle directly into the perp. I have airbags and a seat belt. I'll be fine.