This, I think, but I don't have the best record lately. They can do it if they want.der Teufel wrote: OR — is Keith B saying that it's normally okay to carry in governmental meetings UNLESS they're posted 30.06? Can they do that?
Search found 4 matches
Return to “Sign at entrance to property (not door)”
- Mon Apr 21, 2014 7:56 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Sign at entrance to property (not door)
- Replies: 88
- Views: 16161
Re: Sign at entrance to property (not door)
- Sun Apr 20, 2014 8:23 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Sign at entrance to property (not door)
- Replies: 88
- Views: 16161
Re: Sign at entrance to property (not door)
KeithB, if the school employees did not get the exemption, doesn't that still make it illegal for them if the school does give effective notice according to 30.06 so that they could be prosecuted?
- Sun Apr 20, 2014 8:06 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Sign at entrance to property (not door)
- Replies: 88
- Views: 16161
Re: Sign at entrance to property (not door)
It wouldn't unless the school were a private school. Although, it might still apply to the public school's employees I'm not sure they would really even need it. They could just put it in the employee handbook and not have to spend the money on a sign anywhere at all.edgar0400 wrote:How a sign like this one would apply if posted in the entrance of the parking lot of a school.
- Sun Apr 20, 2014 10:10 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Sign at entrance to property (not door)
- Replies: 88
- Views: 16161
Re: Sign at entrance to property (not door)
Yeah, but the 30.06 wording says property. And I don't believe it must be at all the entrances. However, this may not apply if the gun doesn't leave the vehicle.jmra wrote:I disagree. The sign states "premises". Legally premises does not include parking lots or sidewalks. It would make the buildings off limits.Divided Attention wrote:JMPHO, means you can't even be in the parking lot.