TexasCHLforum.com

tallmike wrote: Just curious, why did you decide that this incident reflects on wal-mart instead of on the thief? Honestly, the only actions the store took in this incident reflect well on them, he could have reported the incident to police himself.

I'm not saying that it is Wal-Mart's fault, but in my experience Wal-Mart stores are typically crowded and typically attract a less savory clientèle. Both of which make for a more favorable location for something like this to happen.

It's nice that they replaced the stolen items. They made it a less negative experience for a customer and kept a police report being generated at there address.

I very rarely go to Wal-Mart (2-3 times a year), and when I do it's only between 4 AM and 10 am.

I have plenty of other reasons I don't like Wal-Mart (I'll spare you the diatribe). Hearing this just reaffirms the one.

stevie_d_64 wrote:[Betcha they got it on camera!

Bet they can follow the person outside and to whatever they ride off in...Get the tag number if possible...

They may have the theft on camera. There is a chance they could get a vehicle. Slim chance they got the make of the vehicle. Absolutely no chance of a plate unless somebody was watching the person on camera. Even then it is hard to get a plate off a vehicle in a store parking lot.

Just one more reason not to shop at Wal-Mart