Absolutely. I always thought that went without saying...AndyC wrote:Legal residence in the USA is only a right for American citizens - it's a privilege for anyone else, me included. That's my 2c
Search found 4 matches
Return to “ACLU Sues SD over Concealed Carry”
- Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:14 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: ACLU Sues SD over Concealed Carry
- Replies: 54
- Views: 8294
Re: ACLU Sues SD over Concealed Carry
- Mon Jan 10, 2011 8:44 am
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: ACLU Sues SD over Concealed Carry
- Replies: 54
- Views: 8294
Re: ACLU Sues SD over Concealed Carry
That may have come off a bit more confrontational than I intended. Apologies, if so.cbr600 wrote:My "agenda" is: A US citizen is a US citizen. A person is a person. A US citizen is a person, but not all people are US citizens.
What's your agenda?
I guess what I'm trying to say is that one important effect of the 14th is that it, in practice, limits governments' ability to strip folks of their God-given rights. And when any person, citizen or not, is stripped of a God-given right, that harms us all (both citizens and non-citizens).
- Sat Jan 08, 2011 10:08 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: ACLU Sues SD over Concealed Carry
- Replies: 54
- Views: 8294
Re: ACLU Sues SD over Concealed Carry
Well, if you're going to quote selectively, you can make most things say whatever you want them to say.cbr600 wrote:How so? I thought the 14th Amendment said:chartreuse wrote:Precisely. In law, this isn't a Second Amendment matter, it's a 14th Amendment one.
"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States"
Fair play to your attempt at reductio ad absurdum, but there's a shed load of case law that runs contra to your speculation.cbr600 wrote:On the other hand, if the argument is based on the "nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws" clause applying to gun laws, then the same argument says the state can't impose a residency requirement, and tourists have the right to get a concealed carry license. Even tourists from other countries have that right while they're in a state, if equal protection applies.
I have to ask, what's your agenda here?
- Sat Jan 08, 2011 12:17 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: ACLU Sues SD over Concealed Carry
- Replies: 54
- Views: 8294
Re: ACLU Sues SD over Concealed Carry
Precisely. In law, this isn't a Second Amendment matter, it's a 14th Amendment one.AndyC wrote:True - but that's not up for debate at this point. The question being argued right now is not whether they have the authority to do so, but whether they should restrict someone's right/privilege/whatever.
Here's the NRA take on it: http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Read.aspx?id=6111