That's what I remember, with the previous caveat. I don't think RR is CHL friendly.cb1000rider wrote:That's new to me... So he was charged not for the first incident, but for what happened after he was stopped?
Regardless, obviously it makes me think that RR is not CHL friendly. As such, I consider RR off limits in terms of carry.. I live nearby.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “New improper government 30.06 fight”
- Thu Dec 12, 2013 7:11 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: New improper government 30.06 fight
- Replies: 42
- Views: 6808
Re: New improper government 30.06 fight
- Thu Dec 12, 2013 6:54 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: New improper government 30.06 fight
- Replies: 42
- Views: 6808
Re: New improper government 30.06 fight
I'm not going to go back and re -read the string but I seem to recall that handog was in his car and was pulled over by a plethora ( like 3-5 vehicles) of LEO's, all with weapons drawn and trained on him. When he exited his shirt had ridden up from the seat belt and he was not about to reach down to the weapon as he exited. But then I am old and can't remember a lot of stuff! It was a bad deal - I do remember thatcb1000rider wrote:I'm with you.The Annoyed Man wrote: handog didn't get arrested straight away because the officers were not the witnesses to the alleged "intentional failure to conceal." It was another person, inside the building, who witnessed his exposed gun, and she called the police. He concluded his business and exited the building to the parking lot. Police arrived while he was on his way to his vehicle and drew down on him in the parking lot. THAT is where and when he was immediately arrested. Police did not witness, nor review the alleged infraction. They were too busy at the donut shop or wherever they hang out in Round Rock to see the "crime."
How do you clear the fact that the officer, who did not witness the event, wrote down that handog's failure to conceal was "intentional". How do you enter that into the official record of the event if you didn't witness it? If a witness would have reported it, I'd assume that those facts would have been provided as witness statements, not direct officer evidence... In fact, if the witness (lied) and provided that information to the officer, I'd have a much lower level of concern about RR PD.