Search found 4 matches

by stealthcrf
Sat May 30, 2015 11:33 pm
Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
Topic: SB11 & HB910 This week....
Replies: 1872
Views: 404116

Re: SB11 & HB910 This week....

jmra wrote:Can they do the 26 names on a sheet of paper like they did the other night?
I believe that rule was for limiting new AMENDMENTS to those that were on the Speaker's desk.

I think the only way to debate now is on the motion to(or not to) concur.
by stealthcrf
Wed May 27, 2015 11:19 pm
Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
Topic: SB11 & HB910 This week....
Replies: 1872
Views: 404116

Re: SB11 & HB910 This week....

Charles L. Cotton wrote: I wanted the House to concur, but a vote not to concur was not a vote against HB910.

Chas.

Point taken.

I get that things are done a certain way, but it is hard to stomach when the face value is screaming otherwise. Here's to 11th hour recall and concurrence shenanigans :txflag: :cheers2:
by stealthcrf
Wed May 27, 2015 10:56 pm
Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
Topic: SB11 & HB910 This week....
Replies: 1872
Views: 404116

Re: SB11 & HB910 This week....

PBR wrote:
Jumping Frog wrote:I do not have time to read 79 pages of message thread, and I do not know what votes were taken nor the significance of a yeah or nay for each vote.

Can someone please help me with any votes associated with Rep. Patricia Harless on SB11 and HB910? I'd like to know if she supported the right votes or was part of the sleaze to derail things.

I have communicated with her on numerous occasions as her constituent, expressing support for the bills. I'd like to know if she helped, hurt, or was indifferent to these bills.
she voted against HB910 not sure on SB11
Harless voted for 910 in April, then switched to a NO today.

Harless voted for sb11
by stealthcrf
Wed May 27, 2015 8:30 pm
Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
Topic: SB11 & HB910 This week....
Replies: 1872
Views: 404116

Re: SB11 & HB910 This week....

The bold ones are those who switched direction on what is virtually the same language

Yea votes for hb910 with Dutton amendment 4/20


Yeas — Anderson, C.; Anderson, R.; Ashby; Aycock; Bell; Bohac; Bonnen, D.; Bonnen, G.; Burkett; Burns; Burrows; Button; Capriglione; Clardy; Cook;
Craddick; Crownover; Cyrier; Dale; Darby; Davis, S.; Elkins; Faircloth; Fallon; Farney; Fletcher; Flynn; Frank; Frullo; Galindo; Geren; Goldman; Gonzales;
Guillen; Harless; Herrero; Huberty; Hughes; Hunter; Isaac; Kacal; Keffer; Keough; King, K.; King, P.; King, S.; King, T.; Klick; Koop; Krause; Kuempel;
Landgraf; Larson; Laubenberg; Leach; Longoria; Lozano; Metcalf; Meyer; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Moody; Morrison; Murphy; Murr; Otto; Paddie; Parker;
Paul; Pen˜a; Phelan; Phillips; Pickett; Raney; Raymond; Rinaldi; Sanford; Schaefer; Schofield; Schubert; Shaheen; Sheets; Sheffield; Simmons; Simpson;
Smith; Smithee; Spitzer; Springer; Stephenson; Stickland; Tinderholt; Turner, E.S.; VanDeaver; Villalba; White, J.; White, M.; Workman; Wray; Zedler;
Zerwas.


Nay votes on hb910 with Huffines amendment today:

Nays - Allen; Alonzo; Alvarado; Anchia; Anderson, C.; Ashby; Aycock; Bernal; Blanco; Bohac; Bonnen, D.; Bonnen, G.; Burkett; Coleman; Collier; Cook; Dale; Davis, S.; Davis, Y.; Deshotel; Farias; Farney; Farrar; Fletcher; Frank; Galindo; Geren; Giddings; Goldman; Gonzales; González; Guerra; Gutierrez; Harless; Hernandez; Herrero; Howard; Israel; Johnson; King, K.; King, P.; Koop; Larson; Márquez; Martinez Fischer; Meyer; Miles; Miller, D.; Miller, R.; Minjarez; Moody; Morrison; Muñoz; Murphy; Naishtat; Nevárez; Peña; Pickett; Price; Reynolds; Riddle; Rodriguez, E.; Rodriguez, J.; Romero; Rose; Sheets; Sheffield; Smith; Smithee; Stephenson; Thompson, E.; Turner, C.; Turner, S.; VanDeaver; Villalba; Vo; Walle; Wu; Zerwas

Return to “SB11 & HB910 This week....”