TexasCHLforum.com

JKTex wrote:

Judge wrote:People are going to say, do and try anything they can to prohibit, restrict, or otherwise prevent OC.


Just SAY'n.

There's a huge leap between "prohibit, restrict or otherwise prevent OC" and not want to see an OC runaway train that while it may reach it's destination as the OC supports want, has a huge chance of doing massive collateral damage.

A lot of people put in a lot of effort over a long time to get the CHL and start to get the ship turning in the right direction to have a renegade come along and drop a bomb that throws us back 20 years. I fully support OC, but not at the risk that HB2756 as written brings.

Charles L. Cotton wrote:

johnferg69 wrote:I've been waiting and looking forward to getting a oc passed but there's people on here that would rather shelved it because of wording or personal preference than see our 2nd amendment rights expanded.

If you really mean this statement, then I don't think you understand the scope of the problem. It has nothing to do with "personal preference" other than 461,000+ CHLs would prefer that TPC §30.06 not be amended so they would not be barred from entering business establishments that wanted to ban only open-carry. This is not a minor issue.