Search found 1 match

by philip964
Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:25 am
Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
Topic: Castle Doctrine in Texas
Replies: 20
Views: 4475

Re: Castle Doctrine in Texas

Ameer wrote:
Grammy wrote:3. Granted immunity from civil liability for the justifiable use of deadly force. (This is not immunity from suit; that would be unconstitutional.)

Is there anyway you can explain this part further?
Here's how I understand it. I can sue you for wrongful termination even if I never worked for you. The suit should be tossed out but I have the right to sue.
Suits are brought for things that on the face seem silly, but the defendant still settles, because they are afraid of what could happen in court or the settlement is small enough it makes financial sense not to have to defend against the suit. A good attorney can make a silly suit seem very responsible in front of a jury. My personal injury attorney friends consider the McDonald's hot coffee suit a very reasonable case.

Return to “Castle Doctrine in Texas”