How can we fix that? It should apply to my 17 year old son as well as the driver, shouldn't it?Charles L. Cotton wrote:Probably not, because the vehicle has to be yours or under your control. If you were riding as a passenger in your own car and someone else was driving, then both you and the driver would be covered as it is currently written. Of course, Rosenthal would argue that the driver isn't covered because you own the car and would be the "captain" of the vehicle.switch wrote:Would this apply to passengers?
Chas.
Course, usually, they do not get the passengers out, ask them if they have guns (I think).