The State Fair had already been persuaded to change their policies, right? Didn't they have a good system in place the last couple of years, then suddenly implemented this new system this year?
So, they might go back to waving CHL holders through, but then a couple of years and a personnel change later, someone decides to "fix" the "problem" of "guns in the fair".
Search found 3 matches
Return to “A disappointing State Fair episode 10-1-09”
- Fri Nov 13, 2009 4:00 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: A disappointing State Fair episode 10-1-09
- Replies: 358
- Views: 58978
- Fri Oct 16, 2009 2:57 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: A disappointing State Fair episode 10-1-09
- Replies: 358
- Views: 58978
Re: A disappointing State Fair episode 10-1-09
I have a personal solution: I never voluntarily go anywhere that requires being searched or wanded.
I never go anywhere that I "need a gun". I never go anywhere they "need security". The more security "they need", the more likely I would "need a gun", so I'm not interested.
I never go anywhere that I "need a gun". I never go anywhere they "need security". The more security "they need", the more likely I would "need a gun", so I'm not interested.
- Tue Oct 13, 2009 7:13 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: A disappointing State Fair episode 10-1-09
- Replies: 358
- Views: 58978
Re: A disappointing State Fair episode 10-1-09
Long time lurker. Newly registered. First post.
Question for those who have been "delayed" at the gate: What kept you from walking right on into the fair? Most have said they were screened, then told to stand aside and wait. It's not like the person with the wand is going to abandon post and chase you down, and if it takes 20-30 minutes for the security supervisor to get there, it doesn't sound like they have a quick reaction team.
Why not just smile, say "okay" when directed to go wait, then waltz right on in?
Question for those who have been "delayed" at the gate: What kept you from walking right on into the fair? Most have said they were screened, then told to stand aside and wait. It's not like the person with the wand is going to abandon post and chase you down, and if it takes 20-30 minutes for the security supervisor to get there, it doesn't sound like they have a quick reaction team.
Why not just smile, say "okay" when directed to go wait, then waltz right on in?