TexasCHLforum.com

gringo pistolero wrote:

VoiceofReason wrote:I am not worried about it. They can sign, ratify and pledge all they want and it won’t matter to me. As a matter of fact I would like to see them pass a national gun registry

They did that in 1934 for certain guns. Adding semi-autos to the registry wouldn't change the fundamental nature of the law. It's just details at that point.

If you don't comply with registration, they just might kill you. They burned down a religious facility in Texas with children inside and shoot a woman in Idaho holding her baby in her arms, and millions of gun owners did nothing, so what support do you think you're going to get for violating federal gun laws?

Well, here I am. I am not going anywhere. I will make it a point to announce I have guns and I refuse to register or give them up.

I can only hope there are enough people that would do the same so it would mean something.

I am not worried about it. They can sign, ratify and pledge all they want and it won’t matter to me. As a matter of fact I would like to see them pass a national gun registry and 95% of gun owners just not comply.

I wonder if this scenario ever crosses the “mind” of the Brady Bunch, and if so, what would be their response be to people not complying in mass.

I am still steaming about “fast and furious”. The government broke the law trying to “prove” that "most guns going to the cartels come from the U.S."

No one was held responsible. No one went to jail.