If it were a amusement park, and owned by the city, and they posted 30.06 -- seems to me then that since it is listed in 46.035 you would be prohibited from carrying there, and 30.06(e) (the government property exception) would not apply because you're prohibited by 46.035.Keith B wrote:I see the angle you are taking, but I disagree. They are only statutorily off limits if they post a 30.06, and can't because they are city owned. The other locations that don't require a 30.06 to be off limits would be prohibited. It comes down to what trumps what.sjfcontrol wrote:Keith -- as I posted above...
30.06 states...But, amusement parks ARE listed in 46.035 (section I not withstanding, they are still listed there), so the exception in 30.06(e) wouldn't apply to amusement parks even if on city property. Meaning they could post 30.06 and enforce it. The only reason the can't post Fair Park now is that it doesn't qualify as an amusement park.(e) It is an exception to the application of this section
that the property on which the license holder carries a handgun is
owned or leased by a governmental entity and is not a premises or
other place on which the license holder is prohibited from carrying
the handgun under Section 46.03 or 46.035.
It is something of a chicken-egg problem. Or perhaps like a snake eating its own tail.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b3ec/6b3ec18e344cf446f9a5f5e17bdd137b9eb7d5ba" alt="Confused :???:"