I hope your sarcasm was not directed at my post :). It makes difference to the antis' case. Since the shooter didn't legally owned the handguns not other future law could have prevented him to obtain the guns. This is my point but logic doesn't always win.GreenGuy wrote:Are you saying the shooter broke the law???sebis wrote:Apparently, according to the initial reports on Fox News the gunman was in US on a student visa therefore he was not legally allowed to own handguns under the Federal Law. So I guess gun control laws already covered the shooter, it didn't help. This is what we have to keep repeating to the sheeple.Target1911 wrote:Also notice this...........the more gun controle they inflict on us, the more shootings that happen. And how many of the people doing the shooting are Law abiding citizens, how many LAWFULLY purchased the guns, how many hold a CHL?????? Not very many.
--Sebis
--Sebis