you are reading it backwards- but the language used is awful - they need to hire a proof readercouzin wrote:The way I read this is that Glock has provided in their contract with Blueguns that the contract restricts the sale of the blueguns TO the public. Then, in poor wording, Blueguns looks like they are adding the notation that they will now restrict the sales of their blueguns to the 'public' only and will not sell to police etc. Sort of a play on words or tongue in cheek for when the lawyers get their hands on contracts and work orders. I could be wrong - but really, how stupid would it be to sell only to the public, nobody else, and ask that no-one else sell the blueguns to the police etc.Syntyr wrote:NOTICE GLOCKS ARE BACK!
Glock has recently issued a New Contract with Ring's Manufacturing Inc. (BLUEGUNS) to manufacture Glock Blueguns as we have been doing for the past 10 years. This new contract states that Glock restricts the sale of Glock Blueguns to the Public. We are restricted to selling Glock Blueguns to the Police, Military, Trainers, Police Distributors, or Holster Manufacturers. We ask that our customers abide by these rules and refrain from offering Glock Blueguns to the Public on the Internet, Publications or General Catalogs. We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your support.
"that the contract restricts the sale of the blueguns TO the public. " restricts or limits guns sold to public
"We ask that our customers abide by these rules and refrain from offering Glock Blueguns to the Public " clarifies the intention some
the used the word restricted 2 different confusing ways