J.R.@A&M wrote:Wentworth did it again. to Zafferini's resurrection of SB 5, now to Ogden's bill.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cf02/4cf026de25f11c38550babd0f26bdc2fea282197" alt="thumbs2 :thumbs2:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5627e/5627e958e8e7d87d2738092c74415280125fc58a" alt="Wink ;-)"
be sure to call / fax calendars in the House, that's where the "other side" is administering pressure today/tomorrow
Return to “SB354 as amendment to SB 5”
J.R.@A&M wrote:Wentworth did it again. to Zafferini's resurrection of SB 5, now to Ogden's bill.
Jasonw560 wrote: Really? How many votes require a consensus?
Something like 10 of the 15 members of the committee are co-sponsors. There has to be something else going on.
===========================April 21st Calendar meeting Minutes
Representative Hunter moved that the following measures not be placed on the calendar at this time: HB 14, HB 32, HB 107, HB 331, HB 621, HB 710, HB 750, HB 964, HB 1278, HB 1319, HB 1429, HB 1448, HB 1801, HB 1821, HB 2248, HB 2282, HJR 19, HJR 56, HCR 27, HCR 85.
The motion prevailed without objection.
http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlodocs/ ... 100001.HTM" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
YupBeiruty wrote:So, SB354 lives on?
Oh noooooo .....Charles L. Cotton wrote:The legislature is working 6 days a week now.
Chas.
Dunno; with the kidding around today about Wentworth; might just be Dewhurst making a mother's day joke/punishment joke on Zaffrini for wasting time earlier in the week, asking her to work through Mother's day to make up lost time.Jasonw560 wrote:Maybe asking to work the weekend, and worried about 354? If they leave, there might be enough to bring it to the floor and pass it? So it's a "pinky swear" type of thing?
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
NOTICE OF FORMAL MEETING
COMMITTEE: Calendars
TIME & DATE: 12:00 AM, Friday, May 06, 2011
PLACE: E2.018
CHAIR: Rep. Todd Hunter
Committee will meet to consider a calendar.
RHenriksen wrote:Did Ellis just ask Dewhurst if guns are allowed in the chamber?
It was really off the cuff, during debate on SB 1584, after Dewhurst asked Ellis & ?? to approach the front desk.
True, SOME have designated "free speech" zones open certain hours ...RHenriksen wrote:I thought about comparing these unfounded 2A restrictions to restrictions on free speech... then I realized universities have no problems violating 1A rights, either