I'll bite, since txinvestigator was too tired. If the guy's primary repsonsibility is customer service and selling and he happens to be wearing a gun (with the permission of whomever has control of the building), then he's not really security. The same goes for those that pack (sometimes openly) when running a gun store, pawn shop, or jewelry store. If his primary duty is security, then things change.jbirds1210 wrote:There was a bit of sarcasm intended....I realize that they are untrained Academy employees, but this would put them in the position of being a security guard due to them working in the capacity of guarding life or property in an Academy uniform.
Jason
Under nonapplicability:
Section 46.02 does not apply to a person who:
...(2) is on the person's own premises or premises under due person's control unless the person is an employee or agent of the owner of the premises and the person's primary responsibility is to act in the capacity of a security guard to protect persons or property, in which event the person must comply with Subdivision (5);
How'd I do, txinvestigator?
