Search found 2 matches

by 7075-T7
Thu May 27, 2010 7:45 am
Forum: New to CHL?
Topic: Secure compliance vs. Convertible Automobile
Replies: 45
Views: 6719

Re: Secure compliance vs. Convertible Automobile

Btt,

My Non-opinion is to dismantle the firearm in question to the detail strip level, lock each component in an IP68 rated enclosure, then secure all of those boxes in an armoured safe with a minimum of 3 hour rating to incursion. Secure this to the ground outside of the vehicle with a minimum of 4x 1" diameter grade 5+ taper-bolt anchors that have a minimum ultimate tensile strength of 28,270lbs and an minimum ultimate shear of 36,275. This safe must have retroreflective camouflage to conceal it from being a safe to the eyes of a reasonable person. Then you will be in compliance with Texas law.

IANAL
by 7075-T7
Wed May 26, 2010 12:37 pm
Forum: New to CHL?
Topic: Secure compliance vs. Convertible Automobile
Replies: 45
Views: 6719

Re: Secure compliance vs. Convertible Automobile

Purplehood wrote:
Islands7 wrote:I think this is finally going well, good directives from those more experienced.
I still need to post security vs. children (home, car, whatever) Texas law to gain equally good spotlighting & parsing.
Como?
I see your como and raise you a :confused5

Return to “Secure compliance vs. Convertible Automobile”