Precisely.mojo84 wrote:I understand Starbucks position on this. It's regrettable they've been put in this spot. It's an example of someone with a cause exploiting a company or organization for that cause. I think Starbucks was forced to come out with something and it appears they are trying to find a happy medium that is reasonable for both sides.
I think the Starbucks response was a logical conclusion to people turning their property into a showdown area. The response from Starbucks was inevitable. It they toss up 30.06 signs in Texas, that will be the end of my business, otherwise...carry on.