The other way around. OC is already dead per Lavender. CC may be but the fat lady hasn't sang yet.stash wrote:Well, I guess CC is gone, and OC and 3218 are most likely gone. I sure wanted 3218 to be successful. Maybe I can get elected to my HOA and carry under 3219.
Search found 4 matches
Return to “BILL STATUS UPDATE: 4/23/13”
- Fri Apr 26, 2013 9:52 am
- Forum: 2013 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: BILL STATUS UPDATE: 4/23/13
- Replies: 16
- Views: 4579
Re: BILL STATUS UPDATE: 4/23/13
- Wed Apr 24, 2013 4:32 pm
- Forum: 2013 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: BILL STATUS UPDATE: 4/23/13
- Replies: 16
- Views: 4579
Re: BILL STATUS UPDATE: 4/23/13
That's typical, trying to sound as if he's being logical. Campus Carry has nothing to do with a shooting at an Elementary school. He just doesn't want it. But then again, I don't think the House bill is worth pushing the way it's hacked.Luggo1 wrote:
“Personally I think we need a cooling off period before we talk about extending the right to carry on campus and other places,” said Whitmire, D-Houston, referring to the killings at Sandy Hook....
- Wed Apr 24, 2013 12:24 pm
- Forum: 2013 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: BILL STATUS UPDATE: 4/23/13
- Replies: 16
- Views: 4579
Re: BILL STATUS UPDATE: 4/23/13
I know, it's frustrating. I kind of thought with Oklahoma passing OC, it might make it a little easier seeing that the rivers aren't full of blood. But it seems that got "supported" to death. Campus Carry was one I didn't have any idea about. To me the issue is not a big deal and I don't see any real hurdles except, the people that think it means kids with guns running all over campus shooting up RUSH parties. The fanatics seem to always make more noise and get more attention.
I can imagine how frustrating it is for someone that's worked on this stuff for so long to have it amended pretty much taking away the intent. I could not do it.
I can imagine how frustrating it is for someone that's worked on this stuff for so long to have it amended pretty much taking away the intent. I could not do it.
- Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:29 am
- Forum: 2013 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: BILL STATUS UPDATE: 4/23/13
- Replies: 16
- Views: 4579
Re: BILL STATUS UPDATE: 4/23/13
The problem with that seemingly growing sentiment (based on rebellious comments here too) is that if you are a student and even 1 door is posted you'll have a real hard time convincing a Judge that you were not given effective notice being on campus all the time. Effective notice doesn't mean all doors need to be posted, it means action was taken to make you aware. In my opinion, you can bet that the registration process will include effective notice and they may not even post any signs except at main doors that non-student regularly uses.TREKFAN wrote:I wish we could at least get a baby step with something like campus carry. Even if the schools have the option to opt out with 30.06. Just to pass something and have 1 less thing to fight in the future. UTSA will opt out but will have to go through the trouble to post over 100 30.06 signs. I just want to see something pro gun pass.. =(
I do not think it's a good compromise. You give them that and how much harder will it be to get anything changed in the near future? What you'll have with this "compromise" is relying on the school changing it's mind, which means, it's taking the action to allow carry which is a whole lot different that a law mandating it.