I'm sure the whole idea is to prevent ANYONE from entering with a firearm. We'll see how it shakes out.O6nop wrote:If CHLers were allowed to bypass the metal detectors, wouldn't that mean that you'd have to publicly reveal yourself as having a weapon? That would defeat the purpose of concealed carry.
Search found 1 match
Return to “anti-CHL editorial Austin Statesman 1-26-10”
- Tue Jan 26, 2010 10:19 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: anti-CHL editorial Austin Statesman 1-26-10
- Replies: 42
- Views: 6242