TexasCHLforum.com

flintknapper wrote:

G26ster wrote:Thanks Paragrouper! Can't believe you like it in "Fayette-nam" Can I assume you served in the 82d? My nephew did. What is a "Paragrouper?" I know Paralegals are lawyers that jump out planes, and Paramedics are docs that do also, but what is a Paragrouper?

That would be an ocean fish that jumps out of planes.

http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=w ... iSOp4o22Wg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Must be static line only then. No way a grouper can pull a rip cord

Back on topic. When Charles said, "much of SB1581 is unnecessary," I assumed that meant that the bill would go nowhere. So, if that's the bill the CC amendment is attached to, there seemed to me little chance of CC passing. Hence my question in response to his post.

Thanks Paragrouper! Can't believe you like it in "Fayette-nam" Can I assume you served in the 82d? My nephew did. What is a "Paragrouper?" I know Paralegals are lawyers that jump out planes, and Paramedics are docs that do also, but what is a Paragrouper?

Seems like this has turned back into the legislative language again (bill numbers), and not "layman's terms." My head is spinning from the bill numbers. So, is it possible to state the status of a) Campus Carry, and b) Parking Lots bills using those terms (campus carry and Parking Lot), whether they are amendments to other bills or not? Let me ask two simple questions.

a) What does it take from here to pass Campus Carry?

b) What does it take to pass the Parking Lot bill?

Charles L. Cotton wrote: Now that SB5 has passed without the campus-carry provisions, much of SB1581 is unnecessary.

Chas.

Does that mean campus carry is all but dead?