Wow I read some of those comments. LOL, some lefty wackos must have stumbled across that page by accident, they were spewing every standard uninformed piece of anti-gun bigotry the gun grabbers have come up with!
Anyhow, I don't see how these lessees can use the argument that they are leasing as an excuse. The statute says 'owned or leased by a governmental entity'. If the someone is leasing it from the government, that means the government owns it, so it should follow that they can't post. If the government is leasing it from someone else, same applies.
Seems pretty clear to me I don't get why there's even a misunderstanding. Maybe the zoo's lawyers are trying to ban guns for some insurance reason, who knows. Or maybe it really is 'for the children'...
Search found 5 matches
Return to “Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?”
- Tue Jun 07, 2005 5:11 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?
- Replies: 1085
- Views: 370811
- Tue Jun 07, 2005 12:39 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?
- Replies: 1085
- Views: 370811
- Tue Apr 19, 2005 9:50 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?
- Replies: 1085
- Views: 370811
- Thu Apr 07, 2005 4:47 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?
- Replies: 1085
- Views: 370811
- Fri Mar 18, 2005 3:08 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?
- Replies: 1085
- Views: 370811