IN the Military, we call your position and action Selective Enforcement ie, only enforce the rules (regulations and laws) you agree with. Ignore the opposite .seeker_two wrote:jimandyen wrote:
What would you like to see happen to him?OK, when I start repeating myself, I'm done with this one....I look forward to seeing the press releases and police reports on how this turns out....and how much taxpayer money we blow on it....seeker_two wrote: 1. I am not a troll. And I'm not an "anarcho-capitalist"....and I'm not even sure what that means. If anything, I'm quite conservative, both fiscally and socially. And I don't see the logic in a budget-constrained state expending resources to prosecute a crime that has little if any ramifications against society and no clearly-defined victims. Let DPS, TSRA, and the NRA shut this "instructor" out of the instructing business....but don't waste money Texas doesn't have to try, convict, and imprison this guy on our dime.
Y'all have a nice day.....
In your opinion, what metric or standard do you propose we apply to select which laws we enforce?
You have given us this example… But what metric(s) did you apply to come to your decision?
Simply put.. how are you deciding which laws not to enforce?