TexasCHLforum.com

One thing in the brief caught my eye. "It would severely hinder decades-long federal efforts to stem the acquisition of firearms by gangs whose 18-year-old members would have new access to the vast handgun inventories of gun shops." Really? They want to hang their legal hats on that argument? I suppose they think the judge will completely forget that you have to pass a federal background check before you can purchase a firearm? If I were a judge, I would suggest that they might want to reconsider including that argument in their brief if they want me to take them seriously.