I would likely get all of the scope I need right now for ~$950 in the Vortex PST line, which would save me more than enough money to get into reloading and out to the range, which is going to help me a lot more than a $2300 NF, even if it is one of the better scopes money can buy. I'd only be looking at NF FFPor the Razor if I could find one used for $1500 or so. That is why I discounted the NF F1s because even used they are typically $2000.Longshot38 wrote:It is a NF. But I have question for you. Why rule out NF just because of FFP? NF offers the F1 scopes which are FFP.cyphur wrote:If you do not mind, what glass and bolt knob do you have on there? Turrets look like NF....Thumper wrote:I love my Rem 7005R. It will ring 10" plates at 1000 all day long. (Sometimes, it will even do it with me shooting it).
[ Image ]
I like the .308 round for that distance and below. Were I inclined to start shooting at ranges longer than that, I would probably look at a setup in .338LM.
Looking to put some temp glass on my .308 for load development and to work up to 500 yards, while saving for a Vortex PST or Razor(or maybe a NF if I decide FFP is not a requirement).
Not bashing NF at all, quite the opposite, the NF F1 simply do not fit into my need vs cost matrix right now. Neither does the Razor at retail prices....
