TexasCHLforum.com

philip964 wrote:http://www.wjla.com/articles/2015/06/dy ... 14915.html

Shooter tried to take his life at the church but ran out of bullets.

Yet more evidence of SC's very bad gun laws. If that church hadn't been a gun free zone, someone there might have been able to loan him just one more bullet (and probably at high velocity).

dale blanker wrote:Well, the pastor was effectively accused of neglect and therefore partially responsible for avoidable deaths. I suspect the families did not need to hear that from Charles so quickly. It could have waited, don't you think?

I won't try to justify the timing of Obama's gun control comments but I suspect the family was not has bothered by that nearly as much as hearing their pastor's neglect was a major factor in the disaster.

What I highlighted in red is where your logic falls apart. Charles posted his comments on a board that is dedicated to Texas CHL holders. Those families would never have heard about his comment if it were not brought to light by anti gun people for purely political purposes.

Now I ask you, who is the real villain here... The person who voices a personal opinion, or the person who exploits that opinion for personal or political gain?