Search found 1 match

by i8godzilla
Sat Oct 29, 2011 11:26 am
Forum: Other States
Topic: OH - LEO Notification goes BAD, really BAD.
Replies: 189
Views: 29647

Re: OH - LEO Notification goes BAD, really BAD.

bilgerat57 wrote:
Jumping Frog wrote:
philip964 wrote:Interesting the difference between Texas and Ohio. They have to constantly sue the government to get their rights under the constitution and Ohio law. :txflag:
What is going on here is the prosecutor knows that the city is facing a lot of liability from a civil suit, so they are desperately trying to push through any kind of criminal conviction so that it will help their defense in the civil rights case.
Given the nature and degree of the evidence against the officer, I would think that the best course would be for them to dismiss the charges and hammer the officer into the ground, then tell the civil case jury, "Yes an error was made and we vigorously corrected it!" You can bet that man's attorney will use the criminal proceedings to inflame the civil jury against the govt. and township. Even if they win the criminal case it's going to bite them on the backside. I wouldn't be surprised if the feds get called to investigate possible civil rights violations by the PD since this is not the only incident involving this officer. :rules:
Really? This administration? I am surprised Holder and company are not spinning this incident into "why there should be no guns in cars".

Return to “OH - LEO Notification goes BAD, really BAD.”