My wife says I look scary.The Annoyed Man wrote:Perhaps I should have amended my comments about belts to exclude anyone with a GQ figure (and pretty looks ). I've lost 54.6 lbs since March 8th as of this morning, but it is going to be a loooong time before "no belts" works for me. I suspect though that for most of us who don't have property to work around and spend most of our time at a desk, a belt is de rigueur for avoiding gun-related wardrobe malfunctions.VMI77 wrote:I've carried a Glock 21 in a Blackhawk serpa holster all day, working around my property, no belt, without a problem. Granted, the pants were fairly snug, and there was some slight sagging, but not enough to be a problem.The Annoyed Man wrote:Over 50 or not, the decision to never wear a belt is certainly yours to make, but in so doing you're eliminating by default most methods of carrying your gun on your waist. Your waistband may support a paddle holster for a short time, but eventually it IS going to pull your pants down......unless you get a belt.winters wrote:Is their any holsters that work without wearing a belt? The only time I wear a belt is at work. I refuse to wear one any other time. Seems like the whole belt thing is from my fathers generation.
By the way.... My 25 year old son carries on his waist with a belt, so belts aren't just reserved for your father's generation (of which I am a part). If you don't want to wear one, that's fine, but you asked, and that's the BEST answer. One thing that pretty much all of us have had to do was learn to make adjustments in how we do things when we started carrying. One of those adjustments was learning to dress around the gun, rather than the other way around.
Best of luck.
Search found 4 matches
Return to “Pocket carry with no holster”
- Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:59 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Pocket carry with no holster
- Replies: 49
- Views: 14155
Re: Pocket carry with no holster
- Fri Jun 19, 2015 11:16 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Pocket carry with no holster
- Replies: 49
- Views: 14155
Re: Pocket carry with no holster
I've carried a Glock 21 in a Blackhawk serpa holster all day, working around my property, no belt, without a problem. Granted, the pants were fairly snug, and there was some slight sagging, but not enough to be a problem.The Annoyed Man wrote:Over 50 or not, the decision to never wear a belt is certainly yours to make, but in so doing you're eliminating by default most methods of carrying your gun on your waist. Your waistband may support a paddle holster for a short time, but eventually it IS going to pull your pants down......unless you get a belt.winters wrote:Is their any holsters that work without wearing a belt? The only time I wear a belt is at work. I refuse to wear one any other time. Seems like the whole belt thing is from my fathers generation.
By the way.... My 25 year old son carries on his waist with a belt, so belts aren't just reserved for your father's generation (of which I am a part). If you don't want to wear one, that's fine, but you asked, and that's the BEST answer. One thing that pretty much all of us have had to do was learn to make adjustments in how we do things when we started carrying. One of those adjustments was learning to dress around the gun, rather than the other way around.
Best of luck.
- Thu Jun 18, 2015 3:01 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Pocket carry with no holster
- Replies: 49
- Views: 14155
Re: Pocket carry with no holster
winters wrote:Is their any holsters that work without wearing a belt? The only time I wear a belt is at work. I refuse to wear one any other time. Seems like the whole belt thing is from my fathers generation.
I usually wear a belt but I find Blackhawk serpa holsters work just fine without one.
http://www.amazon.com/BLACKHAWK-Serpa-S ... hawk+serpa
- Tue Jun 16, 2015 10:05 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Pocket carry with no holster
- Replies: 49
- Views: 14155
Re: Pocket carry with no holster
Frankly, if I'd seen you carrying like that my first assumption would not have been that you had a CHL.