If you have a concealed gun and you're in a room with several other people as was the case in Oregon what makes you think the shooter is going to see your gun before he hears it?kopking10 wrote:It's her opinion. And it make sense, No? If you read the Oregon shooting news, the shooter asked the students if they are Christian or not. If they are, he shoots. Relating to that, the shooter is looking for something that he could target. In this case, when he sees a gun, he will shoot.Abraham wrote:kopking10,
You posted: "Her idea was, if you have a gun, the robber sees you with a gun would most likely shoot you."
Please tell me if this is you or your wife's perspective: You're depending on the robber's kindness/reasonableness to do you no harm if you remain defenseless?
Do I have that right?
In general, what makes you think an attacker needs a gun to kill you or do you serious bodily harm? A baseball bat, 2x4, pipe, piece of rebar, or a knife can make you just as dead as a gun. You can be killed by a fist with a hard enough blow to the head. And how about if you're not confronting just one attacker, but three or five with sharpened screwdrivers?
And yes, having a gun cannot prevent all attacks from being successful. Even LEOs get ambushed but most attacks aren't from ambush. Safety requires preparedness and situational awareness whether you have a gun or not, and even then, safety is not absolute.