"We have met the enemy and he is us."
Those who believe that restrictions on our right to carry are an inherently good thing are not champions of our constitution and hurt our cause.
There is validity on proceeding cautiously, and risks of losing some of the privileges we have. I understand that. Charging blindly into the the State house demanding our Open Carry isn't going to win constitutional patriots any political stroke. But there seems to be a Brady influence that believes The right to carry needs to be restricted because ordinary citizens can't be trusted with the cannons on our hips.
I sometimes wonder what part of "The right own and bear arms shall not be infringed." is not understood.
This whole open carry argument isn't gonna have any positive results for any of us.
edit bare to bear .. should know better by now ;)
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Open Carry Article in Star Telegram”
- Sun Jun 06, 2010 3:17 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Open Carry Article in Star Telegram
- Replies: 63
- Views: 9174
- Sat Jun 05, 2010 12:07 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Open Carry Article in Star Telegram
- Replies: 63
- Views: 9174