Search found 4 matches

by Liberty
Thu Feb 04, 2016 3:12 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Validiity of Old 30.06
Replies: 22
Views: 3217

Re: Validiity of Old 30.06

scattermaster racing wrote:another newbie here.
Took my class last weekend and waiting on the state now.
Anyway, I struggle a little bit about all the hoopla over the signs. Which one is valid, legal, and so on.
IF a land owner can simply tell you he doesn't want guns on his property, it seems to follow that he could say so on a sign that just says "no guns".
I mean, even if it's not the 30.06 sign, if you read one of those gunbuster signs, you know that they don't want guns there.
I'm not really sure what I'll do if/when I'm at a door and see one of the old signs. Go in because it's not a legal sign, or go elsewhere because I know in my heart that they don't want the guns there.
Am I the only one here that struggles with that?
In the case of my original post, The property in question belongs to the people. just because some bureaucrat he doesn't like the idea me carrying a gun inside doesn't mean he has the right to tell me so, nor does it mean he has the right to expect me to respect his ' opinion.

If a private business posts anything close to a 30.06 sign it means they don't respect my business, my safety, nor my life and I will try to avoid doing entering such places. but to me a gunbuster sign means nothing more than they don't want to see my gun. Even though walking into such an establishment may be legal, There is a good chance I would be asked to leave.
by Liberty
Wed Feb 03, 2016 8:49 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Validiity of Old 30.06
Replies: 22
Views: 3217

Re: Validiity of Old 30.06

Tracker wrote: Brings up an interesting question: if a municipality posts an old, out-dated 30,06 sign can they be fined? And if not what would keep them from posting them now?
I have one concern about pushing this issue, Inside there is a Clinic, a UTMB clinic. While its not a Hospital, nor can I see how its a school, The clinic is one of several services offered inside this building... While we can push the issue and probably get the sign taken down.. To do so would run the risk of have the invalid sign replaced by a proper 30.06 and 30.07.
by Liberty
Wed Feb 03, 2016 6:45 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Validiity of Old 30.06
Replies: 22
Views: 3217

Re: Validiity of Old 30.06

Thanks Charles, I'm wondering if its worth challanging as an illegal sign.. I'm pretty sure it is government property, and there is no court in the building that I can tell. But I think most CHL holders would just carry on anyway.
by Liberty
Wed Feb 03, 2016 5:01 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Validiity of Old 30.06
Replies: 22
Views: 3217

Validiity of Old 30.06

I soppose it doesn't matter, I saw this sign at the Community Family Center in Texas City. The property appears to be owned by either the City or the State and has the following verbage.
Pursuant to Section 30.06 Penal Code (Trespass by holder of licence to carry a concealed handgun)
A person licenced under 4413 (29ee), Revised Statues (concealed handgun law),
may not enter this property with a concealed handgun.
Just wondering, "Was this Verbage ever legal?" When?

This is at 2000 Texas Ave. I haven't posted to texas3006.com yet, cause I want to find out who owns the property first.

Return to “Validiity of Old 30.06”