I agree with GrillKing and Nitrogen on this one. If the fence sitters have to choose between the antis and the CHLers, I believe they will do the math and figure out there are a lot more non-CHLers than CHLers.nitrogen wrote:Thats the other reason.GrillKing wrote: I don't think we want to force them to 'wear the right shoes'. This will let the 'cat out of the bag' and the vast majority of signs that are non-compliant will be swapped out for signs that are compliant.
Also, I have this theory. Sometimes some business want to have it both ways. They want to appease the Antis, but not annoy the rest of us.
Putting up a non-compliant sign lets them have it both ways.
And is that a bad thing?
The non-binding signs will be replaced with the proper ones and we will loose.
40FIVER