If we are talking TECHNICALLY I think it wouldn't be compliant for either since the law specifies that it....The Annoyed Man wrote:TECHNICALLY, that sign is compliant for spanish speakers, and non-compliant for english speakers. But I agree that its intent is pretty clear, and I doubt that the typo would stand up in court as a defense to prosecution, as every other letter/word on the sign is compliant.
Since it doesn't include the correct verbage in both languages it is non-complaint not matter what language you speak/read. (IANAL, IMHO, etc.)(B) a sign posted on the property that:
(i) includes the language described by
Paragraph (A) in both English and Spanish;
That being said, I probably wouldn't carry past it.
PS.The copying of TAM's TECHNICALLY was in jest, and by no means an attempt to poke the sleeping bear.
