JP171 wrote:sorry guys, but what I see is a lot of self rationalization of false hopes or trying to justify by saying something is ambiguous when its not.
JP, you have been around this board for awhile. Not sure if you recall, but there is a thread where two esteemed moderators of this board, one an attorney and one a former LEO (<-I think) gave differing opinions in the same thread (I believe unintentionally) of what a belt holster was. So I am definitely of the mind set that different LEO's will define the statue differently.
Here is what I suspect will happen in 2016:
Austin- unless your belt holder has two loops for connecting the holster and looks like one found in a dictionary picture, it ain't a belt holster.
Llano- if you have any type of holster that is in the general vicinity of where a belt will go, you'll be fine.