A range owner has no responsbility to take on quasi-law enforcement duties. Just sticking their nose into something they have no need to control. If someone is there with an illegal suppressor, the range owner has committed no crime.TomsTXCHL wrote:I disagree with this, because first of all whether one has a CHL or not, there is no license required to "possess firearms in general". OTOH silencers or SBRs do require a special permit, are very easily identified by bystanders, and if any of those bystanders are LEOs they might be inclined depending on the circumstances to determine whether the owners have them legally. From the private business owners' perspective, it is well within their rights to try and limit "illegal activities" on their properties, so that they don't become known among LEOs as a place where the laws of the land are overlooked or ignored.Tic Tac wrote:Unless they require all shooters to show a CHL or other proof they're legally qualified to possess firearms in general, checking paperwork for silencers or SBR sounds pretty silly.
Search found 1 match
Return to “Today at the gun range”
- Sat Feb 01, 2014 1:52 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Today at the gun range
- Replies: 26
- Views: 4522