My take on it is LIBERTY. We don't need the gosh-darn gooberment legislating holsters.EEllis wrote:Well I think a holster should, at a min, hold your gun secure through any possible activity a person might make. I also understand and and support anyone who feels better about having some form of retention in holsters to prevent someone else from grabbing their handgun when it's holstered. My issue is people who advocate such a thing based on a need. I have looked and cannot find enough incidents to support a belief that retention holster would have any statistical effect on guns being "Taken" from OCers. Right now I would be more concerned with being able to draw and shoot quickly when needed than some theoretical concern about being targeted by a gun grabber.Dave2 wrote:I think the point is that OCers need "better retention" so that BGs can't start taking their guns, not to put an end to something that's already become common... it's a proactive measure, rather than reactive.EEllis wrote:I have just not seen any evidence to back up the claim that, as a group, oc or cc need better retention due to BG's taking guns out of holsters.
At least that's my take on it.
Back when we were a free country, there was a concept of being accountable for making decisions and choices in one's life and then bearing the consequences of those choices.
We can debate back and forth on whether a retention holster is a better personal decision for managing life risk. That is fine, I love debating personal opinions. But we do not need personal opinions codified into statute.