Thats what I really like about this board........ask a question or make a statement and you get all kinds of input, but not a lot of opinions without support. You get the whole nine yards...........txinvestigator wrote:CFR is the Code of Federal Regulations. However, looking further down the regulation, we see the following:wrt45 wrote: The relevant text comes from CFR 39, Ch 1, Part 232.1:
(l) Weapons and explosives. No person while on postal property may carry firearms, other dangerous or deadly weapons, or explosives, either openly or concealed, or store the same on postal property, except for official purposes.
.........SNIP....................
If one answers "no" to all four questions, it seems that one falls within the exception to the federal ban on carrying in a federal facility. The answer to the first three questions seeks to resolve whether one is engaged in the "lawful carrying" of a firearm. The answer to the final question seeks to resolve whether one is carrying "incident to ... lawful purposes."
It is important to note that the term "Federal facility" does not include a federal court facility. Even with a valid concealed weapon or handgun license, it is a federal offense to bring a firearm into a federal court facility. Under this statute, the only persons who may lawfully carry in a federal court facility are federal, state, or local law enforcement officers on official duty, or a Federal official or a member of the Armed Forces if authorized to possess the firearm.[/u]
I think this is pretty close to the conversations I recall when the post office question came up in my first instructor's school.
Its fascinating reading and I enjoy the info and the debate, but in the end I'll stand by what I wrote at first: sounds like a test case in the making, and I don't want to be the test.............