So... Am I reading this right? Does it mean that the DEA is tampering with evidence as a matter of policy? Seems like that could hurt their credibility.The Annoyed Man wrote:http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/ ... 9R20130805
Exclusive: U.S. directs agents to cover up program used to investigate Americans(Reuters) - A secretive U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration unit is funneling information from intelligence intercepts, wiretaps, informants and a massive database of telephone records to authorities across the nation to help them launch criminal investigations of Americans.
Although these cases rarely involve national security issues, documents reviewed by Reuters show that law enforcement agents have been directed to conceal how such investigations truly begin - not only from defense lawyers but also sometimes from prosecutors and judges.
The undated documents show that federal agents are trained to "recreate" the investigative trail to effectively cover up where the information originated, a practice that some experts say violates a defendant's Constitutional right to a fair trial. If defendants don't know how an investigation began, they cannot know to ask to review potential sources of exculpatory evidence - information that could reveal entrapment, mistakes or biased witnesses.
Search found 1 match
Return to “Court OK's warrantless tracking of phone GPS”
- Mon Aug 05, 2013 6:16 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: Court OK's warrantless tracking of phone GPS
- Replies: 23
- Views: 2559