TexasCHLforum.com

sjfcontrol wrote:

speedsix wrote:Mama NEVER swatted my butt before makin' me unload 'em...not since she grabbed me up at about 7 and busted her hand on the "D" cell batteries I had crammed in my pockets...

sjfcontrol wrote:

OldCurlyWolf wrote:

sjfcontrol wrote:
And logically, it simply doesn't make sense to claim that you lose your rights to carry under the MPA by acquiring a license to carry. The point of a license is to grant additional privileges, not to restrict rights you would have otherwise had.

I will believe that when I see a court of competent jurisdiction ruled that way and it is upheld in higher courts.

I do not want to be the test case.

That's fine. The line of my post that you quoted was secondary, anyway, to the primary argument. But you're right that there is no case law to back up my statements. As there is little to no case law to back up most of the disputes that arise on this forum. And given the inherent lawfulness of most CHL licensees, that isn't likely to change anytime soon.

sjfcontrol wrote:
And logically, it simply doesn't make sense to claim that you lose your rights to carry under the MPA by acquiring a license to carry. The point of a license is to grant additional privileges, not to restrict rights you would have otherwise had.

OCD wrote:

punkndisorderly wrote:After doing some research and thinking for an evening, a few things I've taken away from the experience:
1) Turns out that there is no penalty for not showing the CHL now, so he was going on old data.
2) I'm taping my DL and CHL together so I can't pull one out without the other.

I have mine in one slot in my wallet with my insurance card between them. If I have to show ID to buy alcohol or some other reason, the insurance card hides my CHL. If I pull out my DL and insurance for a cop, the CHL is right there too.