TexasCHLforum.com

puma guy wrote:

Andiceman wrote:Just wanted to provide an update. I was at a conference last week at the Gaylord Texan (very near to Great Wolf Lodge, and no 30.06 sign that I was able to see). As we were leaving my wife wanted to take a quick look at the Great Wolf Lodge to see if it looked like a good place to take our kids for a weekend getaway. As of last Friday (10/22), the 30.06 sign was still there.

Looks like heck to me, but looks like a place my kids (4 & 6) would absolutely love.

I wonder if any enterprising criminals review websites listing 30.06 posting establishments for ripe targets or worse set up their own website noting business that would be "safe" for highjacking? Maybe folks who suffer injury during crime in a 30.06 business should sue, especially if they're CHL. Works for the liberals and ACLU.

IANAL, but I do believe that there is a concept of businesses being responsible to provide a basic level of security for their patrons. When a business actively increases the threat potential, this should increase their liability for future injuries that result. In my mind, this is similar to a restaurant promoting an Outlaw Bikers day and offering free beer to anyone wearing the colors of known motorcycle gangs, but then failing to increase security at their establishment.