Search found 1 match
Return to “SCOTUS approves warrantless home entry”
- Tue May 17, 2011 8:16 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: SCOTUS approves warrantless home entry
- Replies: 52
- Views: 4891
Re: SCOTUS approves warrantless home entry
How much trampling of our constitution before we get mad? How far into a police state where everyone is a suspect do we have to get? I have never personally met a bad apple LEO, but I've met several that were extremely arrogant and believed they were better than us subjects. It has oft been quoted but how many people truly believe that we can give up liberty in exchange for security. I was recently lambasted for my comments about obeying a mostly correct 30.06 sign. I was accused of being timid in my rights. We, me and the other party made nice afterwards. However, I see many of the same posters here seemingly defending the SCOTUS decision to invalidate a fundamental right because it makes a LEO's job a little easier to catch a bad guy. To me the argument has now been reversed. I refuse to be timid about the bill of rights. They mean what they say and say what they mean. There is very little wiggle room. So for those that spoke up in favor of 30.06 meaning EXACTLY what it says, here is an opportunity to remain consistent in your belief. The 4th says what it says and busting down a door without a warrant because you hear something is clearly unreasonable.