Now see, here I was thinking (as the news reported it) that somehow a stipulation for legislator carry was tied to campus carry.Charles L. Cotton wrote:There is a thread on SB905; let's keep this one on campus-carry.
Thanks,
Chas.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “SB354 offered as amendement to SB 1581”
- Tue May 10, 2011 2:18 pm
- Forum: Concealed Carry on College Campuses
- Topic: SB354 offered as amendement to SB 1581
- Replies: 127
- Views: 22885
Re: SB354 offered as amendement to SB 1581
- Tue May 10, 2011 11:56 am
- Forum: Concealed Carry on College Campuses
- Topic: SB354 offered as amendement to SB 1581
- Replies: 127
- Views: 22885
Re: SB354 offered as amendement to SB 1581
This may have been stated but a little red flag went up when I read on another article
"The Texas Senate also passed a measure that would allow state lawmakers — themselves — to carry concealed handguns into places where they are normally banned, like churches and hospitals."
I have mixed emotions about this. My first reaction was "it's not fair" and my second though was "maybe this is actually leading from the front and establishing a step in the right direction." But really, what gives them the right over any other legally licensed citizen?
Full article: http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2011/ ... 28061.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"The Texas Senate also passed a measure that would allow state lawmakers — themselves — to carry concealed handguns into places where they are normally banned, like churches and hospitals."
I have mixed emotions about this. My first reaction was "it's not fair" and my second though was "maybe this is actually leading from the front and establishing a step in the right direction." But really, what gives them the right over any other legally licensed citizen?
Full article: http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2011/ ... 28061.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;