Not sure where THAT came from? Not a glock debate at all. Just looking for clarification.DFWTT wrote:Wow, Glock debate. Shocker. My 1911 this and my 1911 that. They all have the same usefulness in an evidence locker. Save your money and keep that safe queen where she belongs.
Search found 5 matches
Return to “US Marshall dissing a 92”
- Fri Apr 01, 2011 10:30 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: US Marshall dissing a 92
- Replies: 47
- Views: 4700
Re: US Marshall dissing a 92
- Fri Apr 01, 2011 9:24 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: US Marshall dissing a 92
- Replies: 47
- Views: 4700
Re: US Marshall dissing a 92
Were you saying that my post was an April Fools joke? or were you referring to the post "yea those glocks known for their target shooting accuracy.lol" by Alvins?DoubleJ wrote:April Fool's joke, obviously
- Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:28 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: US Marshall dissing a 92
- Replies: 47
- Views: 4700
Re: US Marshall dissing a 92
alvins wrote:yea those glocks known for their target shooting accuracy.lol
I have a Glock that is very accurate. I don't follow your line of thought....
- Fri Apr 01, 2011 9:23 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: US Marshall dissing a 92
- Replies: 47
- Views: 4700
Re: US Marshall dissing a 92
Yes...While that is true today, when US Marshals came out, the public opinion of Glock was not what it is today. I remember many many people (LEO's included) that refused to carry a "Tupperware Pistol"stash wrote:I doubt Glock paid for that line. Glock can't make them fast enough as it is.
- Thu Mar 31, 2011 11:22 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: US Marshall dissing a 92
- Replies: 47
- Views: 4700
Re: US Marshall dissing a 92
Doesn't he call it a chrome plated sissy pistol or something like that?
Wonder if Glock paid to have that line added to the movie?
Wonder if Glock paid to have that line added to the movie?