TexasCHLforum.com

safety1 wrote:

TXBO wrote:The main problem with Huffines/Dutton amendment is that some in power view it as precedent to other profiling legislation.

I thought was already had laws regarding profiling? What in particular are you thinking that may come to pass as a result

Charles L. Cotton wrote:

TXBO wrote:

Stripes Dude wrote:

SewTexas wrote:Huffines kept saying that the "exact" amendment had passed in the house. So it would make no sense that it's not the same.

Given what we saw today, I put no trust in anything Huffines says. He had no idea what he was doing out there.

He got it passed.

It was an irresponsible gamble that gained nothing and could have cost much more. It still may have, but only time will tell. He did it to gain notoriety for himself so he can run for Congress. That's not supporting gun owners, it's furthering his own interest.

Chas.

Winchster wrote:Someone posted on OCT FB page that there is a single word difference, possibly due to clerical error, between the Dutton and Huffines amendments.

NotRPB wrote:Sen. Ellis’ statement on open carry amendment
[Press release] Sen. Ellis’ statement on open carry amendment
http://www.rodneyellis.com/2015/05/22/s ... amendment/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

mr1337 wrote:Oh snap. Amendment 9 adopted.

TexasJohnBoy wrote:Lets move this along and get this vote done. Good lord this is like herding cats.


Germaneness?!