TexasCHLforum.com

twomillenium wrote:A little voice in the back of my head says "Remember when health insurance was an individual right".

good one!

Charles L. Cotton wrote:I understand the desire to keep the feds out of guns laws, but we are many decades too late. National reciprocity won't open any doors for further federal control over states. We know how to protect the bill.

Chas.

I'm sorry, but I was once told that by Sen Cornyn. "We will protect the home business, it won't affect you at all". Now it's the home sewist jumping through the hoops and the Chinese manufacture doing nothing.
I simply don't believe that anything is "protected" in DC unless it doesn't happen.

I'm one of the most pro-gun people you're going to find, and I'm pretty much against this bill. mostly for the reasons TAM mentioned. I think it should be handled at the state level. Also, I can see it going side-ways. I can see people start to complain "Ok, so there is reciprocity, but I don't want to do the research about the laws" and suddenly the feds say "fine we'll implement the laws"...someone says "you can't do that" the feds say "sure we can, we took over reciprocity, so we can take care of the laws" and so they do.....

I really don't think this is a good thing.