Posted by "Winchster" in the other thread... http://texaschlforum.com/viewtopic.php? ... 95#p989406" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;sugar land dave wrote:Sure wish I could see the OCT page now.
Search found 3 matches
Return to “Campus Carry -- Where Are We Now?”
- Sun May 31, 2015 5:10 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: Campus Carry -- Where Are We Now?
- Replies: 319
- Views: 101809
Re: Campus Carry -- Where Are We Now?
- Sat May 30, 2015 6:22 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: Campus Carry -- Where Are We Now?
- Replies: 319
- Views: 101809
Re: Campus Carry -- Where Are We Now?
To paraphrase an old drinking adage....NotRPB wrote:Tweets by the uninformed are so funnybreaking, as if "concealed" has not already been legal on "campus" for years and years lol@NeftyGonzalez 12 minutes ago
Breaking:
Concealed handgun's now legal on college campus in the great state of Texas #TXlege
that's just incorrect@wickedmetro 20m20 minutes ago
#sb11 passes open campus carry.....body count will rise. #GunsMatter #txlege
Never Tweet on an empty head.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c75b/8c75b5c2a482fae433af620927027fd08a62e9f2" alt="Laughing :lol:"
- Sat May 30, 2015 6:05 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: Campus Carry -- Where Are We Now?
- Replies: 319
- Views: 101809
Re: Campus Carry -- Where Are We Now?
The board of regents has to approve it by a 2/3 vote and then report it to the legislature 100 days before the start of each session. The legislature can address overreach legislatively during the subsequent session. it will take a while for the dust to settle on this, but it's a large step forward.jeffrw wrote:I'm glad to see this pass the Senate, but I'm a little confused by the provision that institutions may declare "certain areas" off-limits as long as they don't totally ban carry. Couldn't university officials simply define "certain areas" to include classrooms, offices, and the library, so that almost everyone going to campus would effectively be banned anyway? And since there are no specific guidelines on what "justification" is sufficient, couldn't they pretty much just use a general statement that they believe guns in those locations would not be conducive to a learning environment?
They spent a lot of time talking about "legislative intent" today.... very worthwhile discussion and part of it (at least) was captured in the written record by an official motion.